New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Drill Uses Microwaves To Make Holes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have fashioned a microwave drill using parts found in common kitchen appliances. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Science, the drill can bore through tough substances such as concrete or glass without the usual whine or dust of its mechanical counterparts.

Radiation has long been used to forge holes; lasers are widely used to create tiny incisions. The new microwave-drill, however, combines the precision and cleanliness of a laser drill with the cost-effectiveness of a mechanical one. To manufacture the drill, Eli Jerby and his colleagues at Tel Aviv University focused the microwaves from a magnetron (similar to those found in conventional microwave ovens) using a metal box and a piece of cable. Then, with the help of a mirror, the team directed the radiation from the cable's other end at a spot just underneath the surface of the material being drilled. The microwaves increased the temperature of the substance, enabling better absorption of more microwaves, and created a molten hotspot. An electrode pushed through the hot spot served as the drill bit and produced the hole. The scientists successfully drilled holes ranging in diameter from one millimeter to one centimeter in ceramics, concrete, basalt, glass and silicon, and they conclude that "the method is applicable for drilling a variety of nonconductive materials." The technique fails on substances such as sapphire, whose melting temperature is greater than 2,000 degrees Celsius.

The microwave drill is not yet ready for mass production. One significant concern is radiation exposure for operators, although initial testing indicates that shielding will limit the level of exposure to accepted standards.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe