New Drill Uses Microwaves To Make Holes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers have fashioned a microwave drill using parts found in common kitchen appliances. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Science, the drill can bore through tough substances such as concrete or glass without the usual whine or dust of its mechanical counterparts.

Radiation has long been used to forge holes; lasers are widely used to create tiny incisions. The new microwave-drill, however, combines the precision and cleanliness of a laser drill with the cost-effectiveness of a mechanical one. To manufacture the drill, Eli Jerby and his colleagues at Tel Aviv University focused the microwaves from a magnetron (similar to those found in conventional microwave ovens) using a metal box and a piece of cable. Then, with the help of a mirror, the team directed the radiation from the cable's other end at a spot just underneath the surface of the material being drilled. The microwaves increased the temperature of the substance, enabling better absorption of more microwaves, and created a molten hotspot. An electrode pushed through the hot spot served as the drill bit and produced the hole. The scientists successfully drilled holes ranging in diameter from one millimeter to one centimeter in ceramics, concrete, basalt, glass and silicon, and they conclude that "the method is applicable for drilling a variety of nonconductive materials." The technique fails on substances such as sapphire, whose melting temperature is greater than 2,000 degrees Celsius.

The microwave drill is not yet ready for mass production. One significant concern is radiation exposure for operators, although initial testing indicates that shielding will limit the level of exposure to accepted standards.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe