New Drug Could Both Detect and Defend against Anthrax

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The anthrax attacks of last fall rattled an already shaken nation and presented public health officials with two weighty problems: detecting spores of the deadly bacterium, and treating exposed and infected individuals. Luckily, the strain that was disseminated yielded to standard drugs. Had it been resistant, the outcome might have been far worse. Scientists have thus been searching fervently for better ways to identify and tackle anthrax. Now a new antibiotic could help on both fronts.

Researchers writing today in the journal Nature report that an enzyme extracted from a virus that naturally infects the anthrax bacterium assaults the bug in such a way that it would be nearly impossible to create strains resistant to its effects. Specifically, Raymond Schuch of the Rockefeller University and his colleagues found that the enzyme--known as PlyG lysin--targets anthrax bacteria and rapidly ruptures them. Indeed, just drops of it can apparently destroy a test tube full of the bugs on the spot. "This enzyme is almost as effective as pouring bleach over these organisms," Schuch remarks. "There is no other known biological agent that kills this quickly." Importantly, PlyG does not attack other cells. "This is beneficial because, unlike antibiotics, this kind of therapy would not kill off useful bacteria in our bodies and thus would have few or no side effects," he explains. Injections of PlyG saved roughly 80 percent of mice infected with a lethal bacterium closely related to anthrax.

The researchers further note that PlyG could help to identify areas of potential anthrax contamination. It seems that when bacteria invaded by the viral enzyme rupture, they release a molecule known as ATP, which can be detected in minutes with the aid of a glowing reagent and a handheld light meter. Additional work is needed before the antibiotic is developed. But "given these promising results," write M. J. Rosovitz and Stephen H. Leppla of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research in an accompanying commentary, "we expect to see rapid moves to test the use of bacteriophage lysins in detecting and treating other bacterial infections."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe