New Drug May Mitigate Peanut Allergy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A sufferer of a severe peanut allergy must constantly be on guard. Even the slightest exposure to the legume--perhaps from a poorly washed knife or a kiss from a peanut eater--can lead to a life-threatening reaction or even death. But research published this week by the New England Journal of Medicine offers new hope for the millions of people who must avoid all contact with the nut. Trials of a novel drug indicate that it can increase the amount of peanut exposure an allergic person can tolerate, thus offering protection against accidental ingestion.

A team of researchers led by Donald Leung of the National Jewish Medical and Research Center and Hugh Sampson of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City recruited 82 people with peanut allergies for the study. They first tested how much peanut flour caused an allergic reaction--which is characterized by symptoms including nausea, wheezing, vomiting, coughing or the appearance of hives--for each patient. The volunteers then received injections of either a placebo or doses of the drug TNX-901 for four weeks. (Neither doctor nor patient knew which was administered.) At the end of the study, the scientists again tested the subjects' reactions to peanut flour. The team found that those sufferers who received the highest dose of TNX-901 could tolerate 15 times as much peanut flour--about the equivalent of eight or nine nuts--without experiencing a reaction. "We believe that patients would have to continue the injections for the benefits to persist and they still would need to be careful about what they eat," Sampson says. "But, because the amount they could consume without serious reaction would be greatly increased, the fear of accidental ingestion that detracts from quality of life for many patients would be eliminated."

Unlike current treatments that are administered after the onset of an allergic reaction, TNX-901 serves to inhibit the response before it begins. The drug consists of a genetically engineered antibody that binds to IgE, an antibody responsible for starting the body's allergic response. "Our results indicate that the anti-IgE antibody could become the first preventative medicine for peanut allergies," Leung comments. Approval of the drug by the Food and Drug Administration is still a few years away, however. In addition, legal tussles between three competing drug companies have further stalled future trials that could lead to FDA endorsement of TNX-901.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe