New Drug Neutralizes Anthrax Toxin in Rats

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

After the recent cases of anthrax infection reported in Florida and New York, the dearth of vaccine against this potentially deadly disease is more worrisome than ever. There are other strategies on the horizon to fight anthrax, though. In this month's Nature Biotechnology, researchers at Harvard Medical School publish the first results in rats of a drug designed to neutralize the toxin that makes anthrax infection lethal.

When R. John Collier and his co-workers simultaneously injected rats with 10 times the lethal dose of anthrax toxin and a toxin inhibitor developed in Collier¿s lab, the animals' symptoms were delayed or didn't appear after one week, depending on how much of the drug they were given. They were also protected by antitoxin injected three to four minutes later. Such rats normally die within a few hours of exposure to anthrax. The drug still has to be tested against whole bacteria, but this initial result suggests the drug or something like it "could be a useful therapeutic ally against clinical anthrax," Collier and co-workers write.

Antibiotics can kill the anthrax bacterium, but the toxin it secretes, which actually causes symptoms and kills host cells, may already be present in lethal amounts by the time the drugs are administered. Anthrax toxin is composed of a protein-digesting enzyme, or protease, and seven small pieces that attach to the host cell, forming a pore. After the cell unwittingly swallows the toxin, the protease enzyme slides through the pore and into the cell to chew up its innards. The antitoxin consists of more than 20 linked copies of a small protein that latch onto the pore, preventing the protease from getting inside the cell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Collier published earlier this year in Science on another antitoxin¿an altered form of the protein that makes up the pore¿which seems to be even more effective, he tells Scientific American. It would be hard for a bioterrorist to find a strain of anthrax that could resist either approach, he adds, because the toxin has only a few "probably inconsequential" differences from strain to strain.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe