New Drugs May Enable Women to Stop Menstruation by Popping a Pill

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Preliminary findings now suggest that it may be possible in the near future to reversibly suppress menstruation using new progestin antagonists, a class of drugs that includes the controversial abortion pill RU-486. Robert Brenner and his colleagues in the Division of Reproductive Sciences at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center tested two such antiprogestins in rhesus macaque monkeys and report in the journal Human Reproduction that they discovered no ill effects. "Our goal in these studies was to obtain pre-clinical data prior to clinical development," Brenner says, "and these results are very encouraging."

One drug the scientists evaluated, dubbed ZK 137 316, blocked menstruation while, at a certain dose, allowing ovulation to continue. The other compound, ZK 230 211, blocked both processes. All of the treated animals remained healthy throughout the trials, and all returned to normal menstrual cycles within 15 to 41 days after receiving either drug. Because both antiprogestins stop estrogen from promoting the buildup of tissue in the uterus, they might prove useful in preventing the dangerous accumulation of endometrial cells that occurs in endometriosis. The excess cells can escape the womb and attach to other organs, where they bleed each month and cause pain.

"I would emphasis that we are not talking here only about lifestyle choices but also about the potential to bring relief to the many women who suffer years of misery from distressing complaints such as endometriosis and painful and excessive monthly bleeding," Brenner notes. "In fact, excessive bleeding is one of the major reasons that women undergo hysterectomy, and this treatment may also reduce the need for this surgical procedure, with all its attendant risks and costs."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe