New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Findings Challenge Climatic 'See-Saw' Effect

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In order to forecast future long-term climate change accurately, scientists must first understand fluctuations that have already occurred. At the end of the last ice age, between 18,000 and 10,000 years ago, a succession of abrupt climate shifts occurred that had consequences around the globe. Earlier studies had suggested that a "see-saw" effect tied warming episodes in the Northern Hemisphere to opposing fluctuations in the Southern Hemisphere. But according to the results of a study published in the current issue of the journal Science, cooling in the south may actually have happened first.

Vin Morgan of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Center and his colleagues studied an ice core collected from the Law Dome site in Antarctica (see image). By comparing the Antarctic core to ones collected in Greenland, the team determined that the Southern Hemisphere began cooling prior to the warming recorded 14,500 years ago in Greenland. As a result, the scientists conclude that the southern changes were not a direct consequence of alterations in oceanic heat transfer brought on by changes in the Northern Hemisphere. Due to uncertainties surrounding the ages of the ice cores, the scientists could not dismiss the possibility that the changes occurred at the same time. According to an accompanying commentary by Thomas F. Stocker of the University of Bern in Switzerland, only further study of more high-resolution Antarctic ice cores will "provide a more spatially complete picture of abrupt climate changes and glacial-interglacial transitions."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe