New Findings Challenge Climatic 'See-Saw' Effect

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In order to forecast future long-term climate change accurately, scientists must first understand fluctuations that have already occurred. At the end of the last ice age, between 18,000 and 10,000 years ago, a succession of abrupt climate shifts occurred that had consequences around the globe. Earlier studies had suggested that a "see-saw" effect tied warming episodes in the Northern Hemisphere to opposing fluctuations in the Southern Hemisphere. But according to the results of a study published in the current issue of the journal Science, cooling in the south may actually have happened first.

Vin Morgan of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Center and his colleagues studied an ice core collected from the Law Dome site in Antarctica (see image). By comparing the Antarctic core to ones collected in Greenland, the team determined that the Southern Hemisphere began cooling prior to the warming recorded 14,500 years ago in Greenland. As a result, the scientists conclude that the southern changes were not a direct consequence of alterations in oceanic heat transfer brought on by changes in the Northern Hemisphere. Due to uncertainties surrounding the ages of the ice cores, the scientists could not dismiss the possibility that the changes occurred at the same time. According to an accompanying commentary by Thomas F. Stocker of the University of Bern in Switzerland, only further study of more high-resolution Antarctic ice cores will "provide a more spatially complete picture of abrupt climate changes and glacial-interglacial transitions."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe