New Findings on Certain Black Holes Challenge Ideas about Galaxy Evolution

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA/Hubble Heritage Team

Most of what we know about how galaxies evolve comes from observations of a single type: so-called Seyfert galaxies (see image). Scientists believe that supermassive black holes at the cores of these systems drive galaxy formation. New findings published in this week's issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters, however, indicates that many of these central black holes may be less powerful than previously thought.

Scientists break Seyfert galaxies into two groups: Seyfert 1 galaxies display bright energetic emissions from their black holes; Seyfert 2 galaxies do not. To explain the difference, some have suggested that a donut-shaped cloud of gas and dust surrounding the black hole simply obscures its view from Earth. But Hien Tran of Johns Hopkins University, who conducted the study, found that instead, some Seyfert 2 galaxies may actually contain black holes that are less active than those found in Seyfert 1 galaxies.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tran looked at data from 50 Seyfert 2 galaxies and found that, based on a spectroscopic analysis of their polarized light, only half resembled Seyfert 1 galaxies. "The other half of these galaxies, though, don't seem to fit the model," he says. "The signature of the central black hole's activity doesn't appear even when you observe the galaxy in polarized light." For the time being, Tran has christened these galaxies "pure Seyfert 2 galaxies," or "pure S2s."

Tran also looked at infrared emissions from pure S2s and concluded that, on average, they were cooler than the other Seyfert galaxies. "This correlates well with the idea that pure S2s may have a less active central black hole," he says. "Less active central black holes should heat up the surrounding gas and dust less than active black holes."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe