New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Form of Ice Forms in Graphene "Sandwich"

The ice's unusual square structure suggests why water can zip through stacks of the atom-thick sheets of carbon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By flattening a droplet of water between two sheets of graphene, researchers have created a new form of ice. Just a few molecules thick, its atoms are locked in a square grid pattern.

The discovery of ‘square ice’ highlights another remarkable property of graphene, which consists of flat, atom-thick sheets of carbon. Not only are graphene sheets remarkably stiff, strong and conductive, but they can also exert immense pressure on molecules trapped between them. This could explain why water seeps through stacks of graphene very quickly — a property that suggests the material could be used in desalination membranes to purify water.
 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Back in 2012, a team led by Andre Geim at the University of Manchester, UK — who shared the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics for isolating and studying graphene — found that water vapor could pass through laminated sheets of graphene oxide, something that not even helium gas could manage. Two years later, they showed that liquid water performed the same trick through stacks of graphene oxide, even though those stacks filtered out other molecules.

Computer simulations suggested that water was forming layers of square ice between the graphene sheets. Pushing the ice from one end shunted all the molecules forward in concert, like carriages in a high-speed train. “But you never trust molecular-dynamics simulations,” says Geim. Hence the latest experiment.

Ice to meet you
Geim’s team dropped one microliter of water on to a sheet of graphene, and then placed a second graphene wafer on top, all at room temperature. As the water slowly evaporated, the graphene sheets were squeezed together until they were less than one nanometre apart, trapping pockets of water in the sandwich.

Transmission electron microscopy revealed that these pockets contained square ice. “It’s not totally unexpected,” says Alan Soper, a physicist at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Harwell, UK, who wrote a News & Views article that accompanies the report of the discovery, which is published in Nature. When water gathers into small clusters of just eight molecules, for example, it forms a cubic structure. “But it’s never been observed in such an extended layer,” he says.

Soper reckons that square ice qualifies as a new crystalline phase of ice, joining 17 others that have already been observed.

Flat hunting
Square ice is strikingly different from normal ice. In a single, V-shaped water molecule (H2O), an oxygen atom is connected to two hydrogen atoms by strong bonds. But it also forms weaker attractions to hydrogen atoms in two neighbouring water molecules. In ice, these four bonds are usually arranged in a tetrahedral (pyramid) shape.

But in a layer of square ice, all the atoms lie in a flat plane with a right angle between each oxygen–hydrogen bond. Geim’s patches of square ice contained one, two or three of these layers, with oxygen atoms in adjacent layers sitting directly on top of one another.

The team calculated that the graphene sheets must be exerting more than 10,000 times atmospheric pressure to flatten water in this way. “It was a surprise the pressure was so high,” says Geim. That pressure is generated when the graphene’s carbon atoms get close enough to distort each other’s electron clouds. This causes a mutual attraction, known as the van der Waals force, between carbon atoms in adjacent graphene layers. “It’s like having millions of little springs holding them together,” says Soper.

Geim thinks that square ice could turn up in other tight spaces, such as the interiors of nanotubes. And pinning down its properties should help the development of improved desalination filters based on graphene, he adds. “Finding out how the water behaves in a capillary is a big part of what we need to do to make a good filter,” says Geim. “This is a very important step.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on March 25, 2015.

Mark Peplow is a journalist based in Penrith, England.

More by Mark Peplow

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe