New Gene for Type 2 Diabetes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Type 2 diabetes has a broad reach: it can wreak havoc on many different organs, including the eyes, the kidneys and the heart, and it affects some 135 million people worldwide. But it doesn't do so at random. Individuals are rendered more susceptible by environmental factors such as diet and by complex sets of genetic influences. Researchers have had a hard time unraveling the latter part of that risk equation, because a single gene isn't to blame. But now they have found a gene that's definitely at least partially at fault.

Having screened Mexican Americans and Finns prone to type 2 diabetes, Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Graeme Bell and his colleagues at the University of Chicago uncovered single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene for calpain-10 on chromosome 2, which they describe in the October issue of Nature Genetics. A related paper in the Journal of Clinical Investigation from the same authors and scientitsts at the National Institutes of Health reveals the same calpain-10 SNP in a high-risk population of Pima Indians. "This was the first genome-wide screen for susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes," Bell says. "Such an identification had never been done before for such a genetically complex disorder."

The find is somewhat unexpected because calpain-10 produces a protein-snipping enzyme when expressed--not something that anyone had guessed might be involved with diabetes. More surprising still, although Bell's team confirmed that low levels of this protein do correlate to an increased risk for type 2 diabetes, the SNP they found on the gene isn't within the region of calpain-10 that encodes that protein. "Clearly, once we understand more about the pathway, it could lead to new therapeutic approaches for treating diabetes," Bell adds. "But we don't know enough about the pathway right now to predict whether or not that realization will come to pass."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe