New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Gene for Type 2 Diabetes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Type 2 diabetes has a broad reach: it can wreak havoc on many different organs, including the eyes, the kidneys and the heart, and it affects some 135 million people worldwide. But it doesn't do so at random. Individuals are rendered more susceptible by environmental factors such as diet and by complex sets of genetic influences. Researchers have had a hard time unraveling the latter part of that risk equation, because a single gene isn't to blame. But now they have found a gene that's definitely at least partially at fault.

Having screened Mexican Americans and Finns prone to type 2 diabetes, Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator Graeme Bell and his colleagues at the University of Chicago uncovered single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene for calpain-10 on chromosome 2, which they describe in the October issue of Nature Genetics. A related paper in the Journal of Clinical Investigation from the same authors and scientitsts at the National Institutes of Health reveals the same calpain-10 SNP in a high-risk population of Pima Indians. "This was the first genome-wide screen for susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes," Bell says. "Such an identification had never been done before for such a genetically complex disorder."

The find is somewhat unexpected because calpain-10 produces a protein-snipping enzyme when expressed--not something that anyone had guessed might be involved with diabetes. More surprising still, although Bell's team confirmed that low levels of this protein do correlate to an increased risk for type 2 diabetes, the SNP they found on the gene isn't within the region of calpain-10 that encodes that protein. "Clearly, once we understand more about the pathway, it could lead to new therapeutic approaches for treating diabetes," Bell adds. "But we don't know enough about the pathway right now to predict whether or not that realization will come to pass."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe