New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Gene May Help Predict and Treat Chronic Pain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Patients at risk for chronic pain following major surgery might be identified before going under the knife, according to a new study. People who have a certain gene variant are at lower risk of developing severe chronic pain and are less sensitive to painful stimuli, researchers report. Besides the potential for diagnosing the risk of chronic pain, the discovery offers a starting point for identifying new painkillers.

Chronic pain is remarkably common after major surgery, occurring after 15 percent of hernial repairs and up to 50 percent of mastectomies, for example. Various biological factors can change the sensitivity of pain receptors or how the nervous system processes their input, but the biological causes of chronic hypersensitivity to pain have remained mysterious. Looking for genes that might play a role, pain researcher Clifford Woolf of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues scanned for gene activity in rats given sciatic nerve injuries. They found a conspicuous uptick in the activity of several genes all involved in producing tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a chemical assistant to enzymes that manufacture nitric oxide and several neurotransmitters.

One of the more active genes encoded an enzyme called GTP cyclohydrolase (GCH1). Tellingly, when the researchers injected mice with an inhibitor of GCH1, the animals went from exhibiting signs of chronic pain to displaying normal pain responses, whereas injections of BH4 made the mice much more sensitive to pain, according to a paper published online October 22 in Nature Medicine.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The gch1 gene turns up in human pain, too. In a study of surgical disk removal for back pain, those with one copy of a gch1 variant--30 percent of the total--reported less frequent pain after surgery, the group found. Three percent of those studied had two copies of the variant and were at even lower risk for chronic pain. Similarly, in studies of temporary pain, people were less sensitive to pinches, heat and pressure if they possessed one or two copies of the gch1 variant. The protective variant becomes more active when chemically stimulated, suggesting that it kicks in after nerve damage and inflammation, and seems to work by influencing nitric oxide synthesis, the researchers report. "We really think we've uncovered a completely novel pathway with a novel regulator of pain," says Woolf, who founded a biotech to find inhibitors of the GCH1 enzyme. About 30 percent of people overall have the variant gene, he notes.

"The authors have done an elegant piece of work," says pain researcher Michael Salter of the University of Toronto. Linking the GCH1 enzyme to pain "is unprecedented and represents a marked shift in our understanding," he says. Applying the finding will require a lot of work, he cautions, but he adds that "this provides the basis for exploring entirely new types of drug therapies for pain in humans" and may eventually make it possible to tailor pain treatment to the individual.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe