New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Initiative to Set Global Agenda for Science, Technology and Innovation

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the April 2013 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We packed into the elegantly appointed White House room. The buzzing crowd hushed as President Barack Obama stepped to the lectern. He spoke about the work of some two dozen honorees sitting before us—the winners of the National Medals of Science and Technology, the highest honors bestowed by the U.S. government.

“Thanks to the sacrifices they've made, the chances they've taken—the gallons of coffee they've consumed—we now have batteries that power everything from cell phones to electric cars,” he said. “We have a map of the human genome and new ways to produce renewable energy. We're learning to grow organs in the lab and better understand what's happening in our deepest oceans.” (Find my blog about the event and the winners at http://goo.gl/O3uFG. One is Robert Langer of M.I.T. and a member of the Scientific American Board of Advisers.)

From energy independence to cures for what ails us, science, technology and innovation are our best tools to address the needs of a growing population living in a finite world. The week before the White House ceremony, I was overseas at another event that noted the importance of research: the World Economic Forum (WEF) at Davos, Switzerland, the annual meeting of policy and business leaders. For my part, I moderated, spoke as a panelist, or served as rapporteur (an official commenter) for various sessions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More important, that meeting marked the start of an exciting initiative: developing a Global Agenda for Science, Technology and Innovation. I was privileged to participate in the small session convened by the WEF to kick off this process, along with my NPG colleague Philip Campbell, editor in chief of Nature. The goal is to crystallize focus around key topics and to help bring stakeholders together, improving the flow of information as well as the policy discussions surrounding the application of problem-solving research and technology to global challenges.

At the Annual Meeting of the New Champions to be held in China this September, also called the “Summer Davos,” members of related communities will gather to help shape the agenda's basic principles. We hope to present at Davos in 2014.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 308 Issue 4This article was published with the title “A New Agenda” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 308 No. 4 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0413-6

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe