New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Slide Show: Glimpses of Undersea Life at Nation's New Marine Monuments

Palmyra Atoll, part of one of three new marine monuments, provides a snapshot of the bounty of life now protected

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With a stroke of his pen, former President George W. Bush created three new marine monuments some 2.5 times larger than the entire U.S. national park system. The ocean reserves in the remote Pacific are bigger than Texas—335,000 square miles (540,000 square kilometers) of ocean in all concentrated around U.S.-controlled islands—and "the largest conservation area ever protected anywhere on Earth," says William Chandler, vice president for government affairs at the Marine Conservation Biology Institute.

"The important lesson that Bush seemed to understand is that the ocean does have unique places that are worth protecting," he adds. "It's not just one homogenous body of water out there.

But these Marine National Monuments—Mariana Trench, Pacific Remote Islands and Rose Atoll, plus Papahanaumokuakea created off the shores of Hawaii in 2006—are so remote that very few people will ever get to see this new part of the national heritage. And even should you be so lucky as to visit Palmyra Atoll in the remote islands, you would not see much of its splendors without a wet suit and scuba gear.

So ScientificAmerican.com teamed with scientists to put together several slide shows revealing the flora and fauna of one part of these new reserves—as well as a glimpse of the serious science they can support.

After all, these places are among the last pristine environments of any kind in the world. That will provide a glimpse of what a healthy coral reef ecosystem, for example, really looks like. "The first thing humans have done historically is overfished and removed the big things from the near-shore marine environments: sea turtles, sharks, manatees, big fish," says marine conservation scientist Dan Brumbaugh of the American Museum of Natural History's Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, who continues to conduct research at Palmyra. "So the fact that those are still there is striking. There's not many places where we can study what those things do to the overall reef ecosystem."

And, ultimately, it is such reserves that may provide clues as to how natural systems can resist or rebound from larger man-made environmental problems such as overfishing and climate change and its attendant ocean acidification. "Marine reserves give us resilience," Chandler says. "They are seed beds or havens for species in the future."

Slide Show: Palmyra and Scientists

Slide Show: Life on the Reef
Slide Show: Fish, Birds and Other Larger Fauna

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe