New Mars Probe Ready; Old One Found?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: NASA

On April 7, NASA plans to launch Mars mission Odyssey, named after the book and movie "2001: A Space Odyssey." The unmanned orbital probe (right), part of NASA's Mars Exploration Program, is supposed to measure the planet's radiation levels, as well as sample the mineral composition at the surface. Odyssey's gamma ray spectrometer (GRS) will allow the scientists to peek into the top few centimeters of Mars' crust. How much water or ice the crust contains is of particular interest to the researchers in part because the availability of water would make manned missions to Mars more feasible. "I'm not saying necessarily drinking water, but water has a lot of other uses," Ed Weiler, head of NASA's office of space science, said at a news briefing. "It's conveniently made of hydrogen and oxygen. Oxygen is pretty good stuff to breathe; hydrogen is pretty good stuff to use as fuel."

Given that both the Mars Climate Orbiter and the Mars Polar Lander were lost in 1999, NASA has spent an extra $12 million dollars testing this new system to ensure that the mission will go smoothly. The Climate Orbiter burned up in the atmosphere, whereas the Polar Lander is believed to have crashed on the surface after a false signal caused its engines to shut off before landing. Soon after the spacecraft was lost, the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) began looking at and enhancing images taken by the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft, which still orbits the planet. According to one account at Space.com, NIMA specialists may now have found the lost spacecraft, but the report remains unconfirmed.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe