New Model Hints at Quick Formation of Gas Giants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Current models of solar system evolution posit that a planet of Jupiter's size and scope would need more than a million years to form. But scientists have discovered close to 100 similar giant planets orbiting nearby stars, which suggests that they are more plentiful than would be expected if they had such a long gestation period. New findings may help account for the relative abundance of these large gas giants. According to a study published in the current issue of the journal Science, gas giants may take shape much more quickly than previously thought.

Lucio Mayer of the University of Washington and his colleagues spent two years refining a mathematical model that describes how planets form from protoplanetary disks, those spinning disks of matter that orbit young stars. The prevailing theory holds that material from a disk slowly congeals into masses that make up the centers of planets. Gas giants then slowly amass their atmospheres over millions of years. But the new work indicates that the protoplanetary disc breaks up quickly--after just a few spins around its star--and that the cores of gas giants begin to draw in their gas shrouds soon thereafter. The whole process could take as little as a few hundred years, the researchers report.

"If a gas giant planet can't form quickly," study co-author Thomas R. Quinn of the University of Washington notes, "it probably won't form at all." That's because the radiation emitted from the central star heats the gases circling a gas giant's center and, over time, scatters them away from the nascent planet, the scientists say. This effect--caused by neighboring stars that were present when Uranus and Neptune were forming but have since moved away--may explain why these planets don't have gas envelopes like Jupiter and Saturn do.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe