New Nanowire Is World's Worst Electrical Conductor

But being bad is good for tiny circuits that start and stop current

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new type of molecular wire – formed from repeat units of silicon and oxygen – has been found to demonstrate the greatest resistance ever recorded, making them ideal insulators for molecular circuits.

In order for nanoscale electronics to progress, it requires both conductors and insulators. Traditionally, most research has focused on the development of increasingly efficient conductors. However, researchers from Denmark and the US have managed to develop the most insulating nanoscale material to date – siloxane wires.

The conductance of the molecular wires, each a single molecule thick and up to 20Å long, was determined using the scanning tunnelling microscope-based break-junction method. When compared to alkanes, the prototypical molecular insulator, and silanes of the same length, siloxane wires were found to have a lower conductance than both.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Organic molecular materials containing silicon–oxygen bonds have already been found to exhibit promising dielectric properties, and it is thought that the gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest occupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is at least partially responsible for siloxane’s lack of conductance. The calculated HOMO–LUMO gaps have been found to be essentially length independent, indicating weak electronic coupling across the backbone of the molecule. This promotes charge localisation, leading to their superior insulating properties.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on July 28, 2017.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe