New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Nanowire Is World's Worst Electrical Conductor

But being bad is good for tiny circuits that start and stop current

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new type of molecular wire – formed from repeat units of silicon and oxygen – has been found to demonstrate the greatest resistance ever recorded, making them ideal insulators for molecular circuits.

In order for nanoscale electronics to progress, it requires both conductors and insulators. Traditionally, most research has focused on the development of increasingly efficient conductors. However, researchers from Denmark and the US have managed to develop the most insulating nanoscale material to date – siloxane wires.

The conductance of the molecular wires, each a single molecule thick and up to 20Å long, was determined using the scanning tunnelling microscope-based break-junction method. When compared to alkanes, the prototypical molecular insulator, and silanes of the same length, siloxane wires were found to have a lower conductance than both.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Organic molecular materials containing silicon–oxygen bonds have already been found to exhibit promising dielectric properties, and it is thought that the gap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest occupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is at least partially responsible for siloxane’s lack of conductance. The calculated HOMO–LUMO gaps have been found to be essentially length independent, indicating weak electronic coupling across the backbone of the molecule. This promotes charge localisation, leading to their superior insulating properties.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on July 28, 2017.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe