New Phase Transition May Explain Deep Earthquakes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It's time to revise solid-state physics textbooks, according to a report in this week's issue of the Physical Review Letters. Scientists from the Brookhaven National Laboratory and the State University of New York at Stony Brook have discovered a third mechanism by which materials change phase. In addition to diffusional transformations¿the sort that turn graphite into diamonds¿and diffusionless transformations, the books will now have to include what have been christened pseudomartensitic transitions.

Stony Brook professor Jiuhua Chen led the team that made the discovery, using a state-of-the-art high-pressure x-ray diffraction system they developed over the past few years. The group studied how olivine, the most abundant mineral in the earth's upper mantle, transforms under pressure to become a more dense form called spinel. They found that substructures in the material could transform by a diffusionless mechanism, while the rest of the atoms underwent short-range diffusion transformations. Because such shifts in olivine change the structure of earth's subducted lithosphere, the new phase transition mechanism could help explain the origins of some deep earthquakes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe