New Process Could Lead to Carbon Nanotube Price Cut

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Potential applications for carbon nanotubes--tiny straws of pure carbon just billionths of a meter wide--are wide ranging. But manufacturing them is a complicated process that is expensive and often tedious because of the number of steps required to remove impurities. A report published in the current issue of Science describes a simple approach to improving a common synthetic approach: just water it down. The resulting nanotubes were more than 99.98 percent pure without requiring additional refinement.

Many current production schemes for single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) utilize catalyst particles to speed up the reaction, but they can become incorporated into the tubes, decreasing their usefulness. Kenji Hata of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and his colleagues studied a manufacturing process that uses a solid catalytic surface. Under typical operating conditions, it became ineffective after about a minute. But when the team added just 100 parts per billion of water to the mixture used to make the carbon tubes, they found that a veritable forest of nanotubes grew up from the catalyst (see image). Once the nanotubes were removed, the catalyst could be reused.

The authors report that their approach can be applied to a variety of nanotube synthesis schemes, and will make them more affordable and feasible on a larger scale. In the report, they posit that eventually, "highly pure SWNTs could be grown into scaled-up macroscopic organized structures with defined shape, be it a three-dimensional complex structure or a two-dimensional flexible sheet."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe