New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Process Could Lead to Carbon Nanotube Price Cut

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Potential applications for carbon nanotubes--tiny straws of pure carbon just billionths of a meter wide--are wide ranging. But manufacturing them is a complicated process that is expensive and often tedious because of the number of steps required to remove impurities. A report published in the current issue of Science describes a simple approach to improving a common synthetic approach: just water it down. The resulting nanotubes were more than 99.98 percent pure without requiring additional refinement.

Many current production schemes for single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) utilize catalyst particles to speed up the reaction, but they can become incorporated into the tubes, decreasing their usefulness. Kenji Hata of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and his colleagues studied a manufacturing process that uses a solid catalytic surface. Under typical operating conditions, it became ineffective after about a minute. But when the team added just 100 parts per billion of water to the mixture used to make the carbon tubes, they found that a veritable forest of nanotubes grew up from the catalyst (see image). Once the nanotubes were removed, the catalyst could be reused.

The authors report that their approach can be applied to a variety of nanotube synthesis schemes, and will make them more affordable and feasible on a larger scale. In the report, they posit that eventually, "highly pure SWNTs could be grown into scaled-up macroscopic organized structures with defined shape, be it a three-dimensional complex structure or a two-dimensional flexible sheet."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe