New Pulsars Help Solve Mystery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Parkes Survey

Despite some 30 years of searching, gamma-ray observatories have not targeted many sources of high-energy radiation. Indeed, fewer than half of the gamma-ray sources observed using the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment (EGRET) instrument on board the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory satellite are known.

But scientists have suspected that young pulsars might prove very likely candidates¿and early results from an as yet incomplete survey now give further credence to that idea. An international team of astronomers using the Parkes 64-meter radio telescope in Australia announced yesterday at the Gamma-Ray Astrophysics 2001 symposium in Baltimore the discovery of roughly 30 new young pulsars¿two of which correspond in position to previously unidentified gamma-ray sources.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Both of these pulsars¿neutron stars formed in supernova explosions¿ appear to be particularly energetic and young. PSR J1420-6048 looks to be about 13,000 years old, and PSR J1837-0604, some 34,000 years old. In addition, both pulsars have increasing rotation periods, spinning that indicates they are losing energy fast. "For this reason alone one would expect that they should be observable as gamma-ray sources," said Nichi D'Amico of the Osservatorio Astronimico di Bologna in Italy.

The Parkes survey will continue to seek young, distant pulsars within five degrees of the Galactic Plane. But already it has turned up more than 600, nearly doubling the number found in earlier searches. In the image shown, the blue dots indicate all known pulsars. The red dots mark those found in the Parkes survey, and the yellow dots represent the new energetic radio pulsars.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe