New Results Add Support to Hot Big Bang Theory

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Despite repeated challenges from renegade theories, the big bang model of our cosmic origins remains the most convincing: it posits that the universe began in a violent explosion, creating a world filled with hot, fluidlike plasma that only later cooled as it expanded. For decades scientists have expected to be able to detect acoustic oscillations, or "waves," that pulsed through this plasma some 10 billion years ago. Last month, a group discovered evidence of these oscillations in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB)¿in essence the afterglow from the big bang. And now new results from astrophysicists at Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Maine reveal acoustic oscillations in the distribution of matter in the universe as well.

"Not only do these results provide support for the hot big bang inflationary model, but they also show we understand the physics of the early universe," Carnegie Mellon postdoctoral researcher Christopher Miller says. "This physics can take us forward in time, predicting the matter-density distribution from the CMB, or backward in time, predicting the CMB using the distribution of galaxies and clusters of our local unverse." Drawing on a wealth of data, the team created and compared snapshots of part of the universe both as it is now and as it was 300,000 years after the big bang, when the CMB emerged.

"Now that we understand this framework, we can decouple the evolution of the universe from the evolution of galaxies and start attacking other fundamental questions like, How did galaxies form and why?" Carnegie Mellon professor Robert Nichol remarks. "It's a great time to be a cosmologist!"

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe