New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New RNA Muddies Gene Definition

Mysterious RNA may control gene activity in unnoticed ways

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The reason for a mysterious excess of genelike molecules in human cells is finally becoming clear, but in the process is further blurring the notion of what a gene is.

Researchers know that the cells of species such as yeast, flies and humans make far more RNA molecules—copied from DNA—than they seem to need. Now a team has identified three new classes of RNA, along with evidence that genes become more active as these strange RNA molecules become shorter.

Because the newly discovered RNA molecules are born in one gene but may affect another distant gene, "the whole concept of a gene is really up for discussion here," says study leader Thomas Gingeras, a genomics researcher at the Santa Clara, Calif.-based genome technology company Affymetrix.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cells make proteins by copying genes into RNA molecules, which serve as templates for building proteins. The team wanted to figure out why cells create so much RNA from regions of the genome that do not encode proteins. Some of this RNA consists of short pieces that interfere with the production of genes, but the rest is more mysterious.

To determine the function and destination of this excess RNA, Gingeras and colleagues searched for relatively long RNA molecules in the nucleus or cytoplasm of human cells, and for shorter RNA molecules anywhere in the cell.

They identified a set of long RNA molecules, which they dubbed PALRs (for promoter associated long RNAs), and a set of short ones (PASRs). Each molecule overlapped with the front end of a gene, and these overlaps occurred on nearly half of all protein-coding genes.

The long and short RNA molecules overlapped with each other, as well, which means that the shorter molecules may be fragments of the longer ones, the researchers report in a paper published online today by Science.

In addition, they found that the more active a gene, the more PASRs it had. The same was true for a third class of RNA they identified, molecules of which were short like PASRs but overlapped with the back end of a gene.

What that indicates, Gingeras says, is that the long RNA molecules are being copied from near the front of a gene, where they interfere with the gene's production until they are reduced to smaller pieces. Neighboring genes may influence this process, he says, so "you now begin to blur the boundaries of a where genes start and end."

Genes already had fuzzy borders, but Gingeras says the new concept, if true, "is pointing to a much more elegant and complex structure for a protein-coding gene."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe