New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Robots Approach More Humanlike Gaits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have developed three new robots that walk a lot like humans do. The androids, unveiled yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C., are extremely efficient, using about the same amount of energy as a person out for a stroll does.

The inspiration for the robots' novel designs came from simple toys that have been around for centuries: the force of gravity allows them walk down a shallow slope without the need for motors. Teams from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), Cornell University and Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands exploited the phenomenon, known as passive-dynamics, to build their new walkers. In order to allow them to move across flat landscapes, the scientists inserted motors that could supply power in lieu of gravity. As a result, the Cornell robot consumes about as much energy per unit weight and distance as a human does. In contrast, Honda's well-known Asimo robot requires about 10 times as much energy as a walking person. "In other robots the motors are fighting themselves," remarks Andy Ruina of Cornell.

The novel automatons are still limited in their exploring abilities--they can't climb stairs, for instance. The M.I.T. robot, however, can teach itself to walk and adapt to changing types of terrain. Dubbed Toddler, "it is one of the first walking robots to use a learning program," says designer Russ Tedrake, "and it is the first to learn to walk without any prior information built into the controller."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A paper published today in the journal Science describes the three robots. Their inventors suggest that the results could have some far-reaching effects, such as informing the design of a powered prosthetic foot for amputees. Notes study co-author Steven Collins, now at the University of Michigan: "It's not exactly the same thing, but certainly the mode of thought comes from thinking about robots."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe