New Robots Approach More Humanlike Gaits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists have developed three new robots that walk a lot like humans do. The androids, unveiled yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C., are extremely efficient, using about the same amount of energy as a person out for a stroll does.

The inspiration for the robots' novel designs came from simple toys that have been around for centuries: the force of gravity allows them walk down a shallow slope without the need for motors. Teams from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), Cornell University and Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands exploited the phenomenon, known as passive-dynamics, to build their new walkers. In order to allow them to move across flat landscapes, the scientists inserted motors that could supply power in lieu of gravity. As a result, the Cornell robot consumes about as much energy per unit weight and distance as a human does. In contrast, Honda's well-known Asimo robot requires about 10 times as much energy as a walking person. "In other robots the motors are fighting themselves," remarks Andy Ruina of Cornell.

The novel automatons are still limited in their exploring abilities--they can't climb stairs, for instance. The M.I.T. robot, however, can teach itself to walk and adapt to changing types of terrain. Dubbed Toddler, "it is one of the first walking robots to use a learning program," says designer Russ Tedrake, "and it is the first to learn to walk without any prior information built into the controller."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A paper published today in the journal Science describes the three robots. Their inventors suggest that the results could have some far-reaching effects, such as informing the design of a powered prosthetic foot for amputees. Notes study co-author Steven Collins, now at the University of Michigan: "It's not exactly the same thing, but certainly the mode of thought comes from thinking about robots."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe