New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

A New Scale Weighs Single Molecules in Real Time

A new nanodevice can weigh single molecules in real time

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Measuring the masses of tiny objects takes a tiny scale. To that end, researchers from the California Institute of Technology and Leti, an institute at the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission, have built a new mass-identifying device with dimensions measuring in the nanometers and microns. The apparatus can determine the masses of individual molecules in real time—the first device of its kind to do so—the researchers reported in a study published in September in Nature Nanotechnology. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

The heart of the scale is a beam of silicon just a few hundred nanometers wide that vibrates at two tones simultaneously. (A nanometer is one billionth of a meter.) Tiny arms at either end of the beam convert the resonator's vibrations into an electrical signal via a phenomenon known as the piezoresistive effect. A single molecule landing on the beam is enough to shift the frequency of the two tones downward, changing the electrical resistance of the device's arms in a way that depends on the mass of the particle.

As a demonstration, the researchers performed mass spectrometry—identifying the various particles in a mixture by their masses—on collections of gold nanoparticles five nanometers in diameter, as well as on the antibody molecule immunoglobulin M. As study co-author Michael Roukes, a Caltech physicist, notes, previous resonator devices needed hundreds of identical molecules to make a measurement. “We couldn't actually know, molecule by molecule, what their mass was,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new, more sensitive version should allow researchers to perform mass spectrometry to identify the various particles within a mixed sample. A mass spectrometer capable of identifying single protein molecules could prove invaluable for proteomics—teasing out the function and structure of different proteins within a cell or tissue. “If we can do it one by one, now we can start looking at arbitrarily complex mixtures of different things,” Roukes says.

COMMENT ATScientificAmerican.com/nov2012

John Matson is a former reporter and editor for Scientific American who has written extensively about astronomy and physics.

More by John Matson
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Scaled Down” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 5 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1112-18b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe