New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Software Gives Robots the Gift of Hearing

A new approach allows “smart” machines to understand sounds other than speech

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Robots can already discern and react to speech thanks to voice-recognition software such as the iPhone's Siri. But “smart” machines still struggle with most other sounds. “In some sense, it's almost a simpler problem, but there hasn't been a lot of work on noise in the environment,” says roboticist Joseph Romano of Rethink Robotics in Boston. “It hasn't been in the loop for robotic feedback.”

Now Romano is letting robots listen in on more than our conversations. He and his collaborators at the University of Pennsylvania have created a software tool called ROAR (short for robotic operating system open-source audio recognizer) that allows roboticists to train machines to respond to a much wider range of sounds. As described in a recent issue of Autonomous Robots, the tool's chief requirement is a microphone.

To begin training, the robot's microphone first captures ambient sounds, which ROAR scrubs of noisy static. Next the operator teaches ROAR to recognize key sounds by repeatedly performing a specific action—such as shutting a door or setting off a smartphone alarm—and tagging the unique audio signature while the robot listens. Finally, the program creates a general model of the sound of each action from that set of training clips.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The group tested ROAR on a one-armed robot, improving the machine's ability to complete specific tasks. In one scenario, the robot attempted to autonomously grasp and activate an electric drill. Without any sonic feedback, the robot only succeeded in nine out of 20 attempts, but its success rate doubled while using ROAR. If after grasping, the robot did not hear the whir of the electric motor, it adjusted its grip and tried again.

The next step is to ensure the system works in loud environments. Integrating audio into a robot's feedback loop alongside visual and tactile cues could someday allow robotic nurses to rapidly respond to cries for help or enable factory robots to react when something breaks. Although the technology is in early stages, Romano thinks the potential is enormous. “We haven't even begun to explore what we can do,” he says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe