New Sunscreen "Sticks" to the Skin

The active ingredients are encapsulated in nanoparticles, which prevent the chemicals from seeping into the body

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Under intense summer rays sunscreen can help protect against a wicked burn, but some of the common active ingredients in these sprays and lotions can also seep through the skin and enter the bloodstream. Although it is unclear whether this poses any risks, Yale University dermatologist Michael Girardi thinks it is worthwhile to develop alternatives. In collaboration with the university's bioengineering department, he has developed a sunscreen formulation designed to keep chemicals on the skin's surface.

The sunscreen chemicals that absorb the sun's dangerous ultraviolet radiation are typically organic molecules (as opposed to the metal oxides that block the sun's rays in sunblock). There is no evidence that these absorbing molecules can directly harm humans. A small body of research that includes animal and cell-culture studies, however, shows that some of them can bind to hormone receptors. The results may suggest a potential to disrupt the body's endocrine system, the traffic of hormones that regulates reproduction and other functions.

In an attempt to develop a sunscreen that would not soak into the skin, Girardi and his team encapsulated the molecules of the common UV absorber padimate O in nanoparticles of a biodegradable polymer that binds to proteins on skin cells. The nanoparticles stick to those cells even when wet and come off only when toweled. The new formulation protected mouse skin from UV damage just as well as a conventional padimate O sunscreen, according to Girardi's recent study in Nature Materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kenneth Kraemer, a dermatologist at the National Cancer Institute who was not involved in the project, is impressed by the results. “If you can minimize the risk of sunscreen entering the bloodstream, it's probably a good thing,” he says. Still, it will be a long time before the formulation appears in beach bags. This summer Girardi will carry out a pilot study involving an estimated 25 people to establish the SPF of the nanosunscreen at various concentrations. Meanwhile any sunscreen is better than going outside unprotected when it comes to avoiding sunburns, wrinkling and UV damage that can lead to cancer.

Katherine Bourzac is a journalist based in San Francisco, who covers environment, climate, chemistry, health and computing for Nature, Science News, and other publications.

More by Katherine Bourzac
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Skin Deep” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 1 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0716-19

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe