New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Sunscreen "Sticks" to the Skin

The active ingredients are encapsulated in nanoparticles, which prevent the chemicals from seeping into the body

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Under intense summer rays sunscreen can help protect against a wicked burn, but some of the common active ingredients in these sprays and lotions can also seep through the skin and enter the bloodstream. Although it is unclear whether this poses any risks, Yale University dermatologist Michael Girardi thinks it is worthwhile to develop alternatives. In collaboration with the university's bioengineering department, he has developed a sunscreen formulation designed to keep chemicals on the skin's surface.

The sunscreen chemicals that absorb the sun's dangerous ultraviolet radiation are typically organic molecules (as opposed to the metal oxides that block the sun's rays in sunblock). There is no evidence that these absorbing molecules can directly harm humans. A small body of research that includes animal and cell-culture studies, however, shows that some of them can bind to hormone receptors. The results may suggest a potential to disrupt the body's endocrine system, the traffic of hormones that regulates reproduction and other functions.

In an attempt to develop a sunscreen that would not soak into the skin, Girardi and his team encapsulated the molecules of the common UV absorber padimate O in nanoparticles of a biodegradable polymer that binds to proteins on skin cells. The nanoparticles stick to those cells even when wet and come off only when toweled. The new formulation protected mouse skin from UV damage just as well as a conventional padimate O sunscreen, according to Girardi's recent study in Nature Materials.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kenneth Kraemer, a dermatologist at the National Cancer Institute who was not involved in the project, is impressed by the results. “If you can minimize the risk of sunscreen entering the bloodstream, it's probably a good thing,” he says. Still, it will be a long time before the formulation appears in beach bags. This summer Girardi will carry out a pilot study involving an estimated 25 people to establish the SPF of the nanosunscreen at various concentrations. Meanwhile any sunscreen is better than going outside unprotected when it comes to avoiding sunburns, wrinkling and UV damage that can lead to cancer.

Katherine Bourzac is a journalist based in San Francisco, who covers environment, climate, chemistry, health and computing for Nature, Science News, and other publications.

More by Katherine Bourzac
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Skin Deep” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 1 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0716-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe