New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New "Symbiote" May Protect Microchips from Cyber Attack

Security experts are working to thwart a potentially devastating cyber attack

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As microchips have grown smaller and more powerful, they have infiltrated virtually every corner of society, from smartphones to medical devices to the controls that regulate rail lines, power grids and water treatment facilities. Computer security experts have been warning that these embedded computers are highly vulnerable to attack because they are increasingly networked with other computers and because they have virtually no defenses protecting their firmware, programs that are hardwired onto the chip. In October, following a wave of network attacks believed to have originated in Iran, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta warned that a “cyber Pearl Harbor” could be imminent.

Security experts used to take firmware for granted, notes Scott Borg, director of the nonprofit Cyber Consequences Unit, because, unlike software, it was designed to operate unchanged for long periods of time. “Yet the circuits embodying these programs are designed to accept a significant number of rewrites, so they can still be altered by cyberattackers,” he says.

Engineers are making headway in protecting these chips. One new approach, described at a computer security conference in July, is a program that would scan random chunks of firmware code to check for signs of intrusion. Developers Ang Cui and Sal Stolfo of Columbia University say their “symbiote” can work with any type of firmware without slowing a computer's processing speed. It may also detect malware that no one had any way of noticing before, potentially shedding light on an “untold chapter of the history of Internet warfare,” Cui says. They plan to deliver a prototype for U.S. government testing by the end of 2012.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Borg calls Stolfo and Cui's approach “very promising.” Marc Dacier, a senior director at Symantec Research Labs, asserts that a major obstacle to any defense measure is getting companies to adopt it. The Pentagon is pushing for legislation to require the private sector to cooperate with government on cybersecurity issues. Without such legislation, Panetta said in his October speech, “we are, and we will be, vulnerable.”

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Digital Danger” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 6 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1212-14

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe