New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Technique Could Stem Spread of Altered Genes from GM Crops

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A key concern regarding the use of genetically modified crops is the possibility that they will spread their altered genes to wild plants. Research published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences could help prevent these occurrences. Scientists have engineered a strain of GM plant that propagates successfully on its own, but cannot mix with non-GM plants.

Johann P. Schernthaner of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and his colleagues worked with genetically engineered tobacco plants. The researchers first introduced a so-called seed lethality (SL) gene into otherwise normal plants to make the seeds infertile. They then crossed this strain with a second GM strain that carried a gene capable of repressing the SL gene. According to the report, the resulting plants propagated successfully. But when the team tried to breed these plants with normal, wild-type tobacco, germination failed because the repressor gene was no longer active.

The scientists propose that linking a desired new trait to the SL gene "could provide a mechanism to control the unwanted spread and establishment of novel traits within sexually compatible plant species without the need for intervention." They note, however, that further refinements of the technique will be required to optimize it for successful application out in the field.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe