New Technique Estimates Distances to Elusive Gamma-Ray Bursts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: NASA/MARSHALL AND SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE

Several times a day the mightiest explosions in the universe flash in the skies, unseen by human eyes. Believed to stem from the deaths of massive stars, these enigmatic pulses of radiation¿known as gamma-ray bursts¿have long captivated astronomers. But much about the bursts remains a mystery, including, in most cases, the distances at which they occur. To that end, findings presented yesterday at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society may prove insightful.

As the shifting colors of gamma-ray spectrometers show, bursts start out at high energies and fade to lower ones. Studying 16 of the powerful pulses, Edison Liang of Rice University and colleagues found that the rate at which this cooling off occurs appears to be directly related to the distance of the burst when measured in terms of the number of gamma rays emitted since the beginning of the pulse.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So far the technique only works on gamma-ray bursts that have separable peaks of intensity, however. Applied to "chaotic" bursts (those that have multiple, overlapping peaks) it tends to underestimate the cooling rate. Because most gamma-ray bursts belong in the chaotic category, the team is now working on ways to isolate the colors of overlapping peaks, which should enable them to calculate the true cooling rate.

"It's very labor intensive and tedious," Liang remarks, "but we have high hopes it will work." If so, the distances determined using their technique could shed light not only on the elusive bursts themselves, but also on the formation of the early universe.

Gamma-Ray Bursts

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe