New Technique Resensitizes Resistant Bacteria to 'Last Resort' Antibiotic

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Over the past decade, strains of the bacteria Staphylococcus have grown increasingly resistant to almost all antibiotics. Most still yield to the "last resort" drug, vancomycin. But cases of related vancomycin-resistant bacteria are on the rise, leading to a growing concern that the ubiquitous S. aureus will develop such resistance and wreak havoc in hospitals and elsewhere. To that end, research appearing in the current issue of the journal Science may offer new hope in the battle against these emerging superbugs. According to the report, researchers have developed a technique that resensitizes vancomycin-resistant bacteria to the antibiotic.

Vancomycin operates by binding to the bacterial cell wall and interfering with cell wall growth. Resistant bacteria, however, have an alteration in the chemical composition of the cell wall that prevents vancomycin from binding to it. To get around that problem, Gabriela Chiosis of Columbia University and Ivo G. Boneca of Rockefeller University designed a small molecule, dubbed SProC5, that cleaves the chemically-altered cell wall component, thereby restoring the bacteria's vulnerability to vancomycin. Exposing resistant Enterococcus faecium (a relative of the staph bacteria) to vancomycin in combination with SProC5 effectively combatted the bacteria in mice, the team found.

Whether the approach will work in humans remains to be seen. But so far, restoring vancomycin sensitivity with molecules that cleave the resistant bacteria's altered cell wall component, the authors conclude, "is a promising strategy."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe