New Technique to Probe Solids

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2749

Seeing the atomic details deep inside solid materials is no easy feat. Scanning probe microscopy (SPM) resolves only surface features, and transmission electron microscopy is limited to samples readily traversed by electrons. But Robert Magerle of the University of Bayreuth in Germany has found a way to best both of those approaches. His "nanotomography" method turns a scanning probe microscope on successive layers of a material to build up three-dimensional images of its innards at the nanometer scale. The work appears in today's issue of Physical Review Letters.

For proof of concept, Magerle imaged a synthetic rubber consisting of two polymers, polystyrene and polybutadiene. He first depicted its surface using SPM and then repeated the process 12 times, shaving away a 100 nanometer layer of the sample with a beam of oxygen ions before each step. A computer added up the individual two-dimensional pictures to produce a composite volume image (right). As a bonus, Magerle found, the image offered new structural information about the copolymer, showing exactly how cylinders of its constituents were joined.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Magerle's technique, which lends itself to full automation, should prove especially useful on hard materials, such as metals, crystals, semiconductors and ceramics, and might be able to flesh out defects in transistors that are now missed. "This approach may be quicker, cheaper and more straightforward than competing methods," notes Christopher Harrison of Princeton University. "The combination of SPM and etching techniques should support novel observations, while opening up new avenues for discovery."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe