New Understandings of Witch Trials, Synthetic Morphology and the Moons of Jupiter

Physicists attempt to weigh a vacuum and resolve the “worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics”

Scientific American, May 2023

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Do you remember learning about New England witch trials for the first time, maybe in an elementary school history class? I remember being horrified and incredulous—they threw you in a river? And if you drowned, that meant you were innocent? Witch trials seemed like an episode from a fairy tale, something that happened unimaginably long ago during a dark, mean and superstitious age. Well, the darkness and meanness and superstitions have persisted. QAnon conspiracists claim that U.S. society is run by Satan-worshipping child abusers—witches, basically. In many countries today, women (and sometimes men or children) are still accused of using magic to cause accidents or other trouble. Their neighbors, justifying their violence by claiming they're punishing a witch, torture and kill them. It all seems so nonsensical and awful, but as historian Silvia Federici and writer Alice Markham-Cantor discuss, throughout history certain kinds of economic upheaval have increased the risk that witchcraft accusations will erupt and spread.

Let's mentally leave this planet for a moment. What's your favorite planet that isn't Earth? Many of the scientists, journalists and science fans I know are passionately Team Saturn or Team Jupiter. Our cover package makes a great case for Jupiter and its moons being the most awesome places in our solar system. We're about to learn a lot more about them, as journalist Jonathan O'Callaghan tells us, thanks to two new missions: JUICE and Clipper. They'll evaluate Europa and Ganymede for potential habitability. Scientific American contributor Rebecca Boyle and graphic artist Juan Velasco depict the interiors of Jupiter's most intriguing moons and where they might have heat and oceans. We end the report with some gorgeous images of Jupiter that were created by citizen scientists.

The “worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics” has to do with the amount of energy in a vacuum. Researchers have two ways of calculating the answer ... but the results are wildly divergent. Now an experiment, named Archimedes, aims to get the best data yet to determine the weight of nothing. Theoretical physicist Manon Bischoff, an editor at Spektrum, the German-language partner publication of Scientific American, takes us deep into a tunnel in Sardinia to show how the delicate experiment will be run and explain the high stakes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gases in the U.S. Car emissions have lessened dramatically over the decades, decreasing smog and lead pollution. New technologies for electric vehicles, hybrids and highly fuel-efficient cars can help. But one of the simplest solutions for improving transportation—for our climate, safety and quality of life—is more and better buses. Climate journalist Kendra Pierre-Louis makes a great case for why and how more areas should enhance their bus systems.

An emerging field called synthetic morphology experiments with the structure and function of living things. As author and former Nature editor Philip Ball describes, the goal is to understand how development works naturally while making new types of life-forms that have useful functions. Scientists hope to incorporate living tissue cultures, some of which are genetically engineered, to create “superorgans” or replacement parts—even life-forms we can only imagine.

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 328 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Reality vs. Magic” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 328 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0523-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe