New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Views of Our Mesmerizing, Maddening Minds

Scientific American MIND September October 2020

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It’s one of my favorite events in the science world: the annual Art of Neuroscience contest held by the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience. Now in its 10th year, the competition looks a lot different than it did even five years ago. Yes, many entries still show off the vivid and fantastical microscopic images of the brain stained in rainbow colors. But thanks to more sophisticated technology, more submissions each year use interactive digital features to create immersive experiences for the viewer. When these types of installations first began appearing in the contest, I bristled a bit (though I am not now proud to admit it). I love the mesmerizing effect of using fluorescent protein tags that illuminate neural cells, for example, or the cilia of the inner ear, which made up the bulk of entries years ago. These images are quite like modern art you’d see in a museum. But just as the brain is more than a corporeal lump of flesh, so the art of neurology is more than a static image. The new generation of brain science art engages the viewers’ own brains as part of the experience—and sometimes in a full sensory immersion, as you can see in some of the entries we’ve featured in this issue (see “The Beautiful Things Inside Your Head: Winners of the 10th Annual Art of Neuroscience Contest”).

In this issue’s cover story, social psychologist Scott Barry Kaufman examines some of the debilitating tendencies of those with a victim mindset, and he offers a powerful new paradigm for how to shift into a personal growth mode and get the most out of your life (see “Unraveling the Mindset of Victimhood”). Our heads are filled with beautiful and strange things, whether one or the other depends on how you look at them.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 31 Issue 5This article was published with the title “New Views of our Mesmerizing, Maddening Minds” in SA Mind Vol. 31 No. 5 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0920-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe