New Ways for More Stem Cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two methods may dramatically increase the availability of embryonic stem cells. Using biochemical techniques, three independent teams reprogrammed mouse skin cells into cells nearly indistinguishable from the embryonic kind. Using a virus as the messenger, the researchers inserted into adult mouse skin cells four key genes that are expressed in embryonic cells, effectively turning back the clock on the skin cells. When injected into a blastocyst (an embryo just a few days old), they contributed to the development of its layers—and mixed in with the mature animals' germ cells.

These findings, reported online June 6 by Nature and in the June 7 issue of Cell Stem Cell, build on past work of a team led by Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University, which had created more limited reprogrammed cells. Researchers may know in the next year whether the process works in human cells.

The June 7 issue of Nature also describes a method to derive stem cells from single-celled fertilized embryos, or zygotes; previously, many scientists believed that only unfertilized eggs would do. Instead of removing a zygote's nucleus, a separate Harvard University group swapped the chromosomes of an adult cell for those of the zygote before its nucleus re-formed during cell division. The approach yielded harvestable stem cells as well as mouse clones. Fertilized zygotes, which are routinely discarded at in vitro fertilization clinics, are more abundant than unfertilized eggs.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe