New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Ways for More Stem Cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two methods may dramatically increase the availability of embryonic stem cells. Using biochemical techniques, three independent teams reprogrammed mouse skin cells into cells nearly indistinguishable from the embryonic kind. Using a virus as the messenger, the researchers inserted into adult mouse skin cells four key genes that are expressed in embryonic cells, effectively turning back the clock on the skin cells. When injected into a blastocyst (an embryo just a few days old), they contributed to the development of its layers—and mixed in with the mature animals' germ cells.

These findings, reported online June 6 by Nature and in the June 7 issue of Cell Stem Cell, build on past work of a team led by Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University, which had created more limited reprogrammed cells. Researchers may know in the next year whether the process works in human cells.

The June 7 issue of Nature also describes a method to derive stem cells from single-celled fertilized embryos, or zygotes; previously, many scientists believed that only unfertilized eggs would do. Instead of removing a zygote's nucleus, a separate Harvard University group swapped the chromosomes of an adult cell for those of the zygote before its nucleus re-formed during cell division. The approach yielded harvestable stem cells as well as mouse clones. Fertilized zygotes, which are routinely discarded at in vitro fertilization clinics, are more abundant than unfertilized eggs.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe