Newly Discovered Sperm Protein Could Inspire Unisex Contraceptive

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To fertilize an egg, sperm must possess a Herculean swimming ability, one that propels them up the female reproductive tract and allows them to penetrate the egg¿s outer covering, or zona pellucida. Scientists interested in developing new contraceptives and fertility treatments have thus long sought to identify the molecules governing sperm motility. To that end, the results of a study described today in the journal Nature offer important insights. Researchers have discovered a protein that plays a key role in the beating of the sperm tail. The findings could lead to a nonhormonal contraceptive that could be taken by either men or women.

Specifically, the newly identified protein, dubbed CatSper, is an ion channel. Found only in the sperm tail, it appears to serve as a gatekeeper of sorts, controlling the flow of calcium ions into the cells. The influx of calcium, in turn, regulates sperm motility. Though healthy in other regards, male mice lacking the CatSper gene, author David Clapham of Harvard Medical School and his colleagues report, are infertile under normal fertilization circumstances¿presumably because the sperm lack sufficient swimming power. But when the researchers mixed the sluggish sperm with eggs whose zona pellucida had been removed, fertilization did occur. "So the only thing that seems to be wrong in the sperm of these mice is their inability to penetrate the zona pellucida," Clapham remarks. "While this is a bit speculative, it might be that this channel is involved in giving the sperm¿s tail beating a kind of turbocharge at the last instant, when it needs more power to penetrate the zona pellucida."

Contraceptives based on compounds that block the CatSper channel, Clapham comments, could have significant advantages over the hormonal variety. "Hormonal contraceptives have to be taken daily throughout a woman¿s fertile life. Also, they have potential side effects, such as increased risk of blood clotting and cancer," he says. "If a drug could be designed to block this channel specifically, it could be taken by men or women. And it would not have to be taken for a very long period to block fertilization, perhaps only just before or after intercourse." Clapham further notes that male sterility caused by a lack of sperm motility might be rooted in CatSper defects.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe