New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Newly Discovered X-Ray Loop May Be Cosmic Accelerator

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers have discovered the largest and most distinctive loop-like structure yet observed in our galaxy. The immense loop stretches 20 light-years across and could be producing subatomic particles a thousand times more energetic than those manufactured in man-made particle accelerators.

A team of researchers led by Masaaki Sakano of the University of Leicester observed the new formation using the European x-ray satellite, XMM-Newton. (X-rays are preferable for observing the galactic center because the large amounts of dust present there obscure instruments at optical wavelengths.) Sakano classifies the loop's spectrum as extraordinary. "Most diffuse x-ray sources in the universe have a characteristic temperature because they are the residual radiation from an event, such as a supernova explosion," he remarks. "However, in this case the loop is nonthermal and this means that whatever the origin of the structure is, it is not stationary but rather the result of some ongoing process." He presented his findings last week at the meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society in Birmingham, England.

The team saw the x-ray emitting loop while observing the Arches Cluster, a star-forming region near the center of the Milky Way. Whether the loop is linked to the cluster is unclear, the astronomers report, because it could simply lie along the same line of sight. Future observations will help to resolve whether the high-energy particle acceleration is associated with the star-forming cluster, which would be the first time such an association has been observed in our galaxy.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe