New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Trial results of next-gen weight-loss drug retatrutide bring it one step closer to FDA approval

While drugs such as Wegovy target a single gut hormone, retatrutide is among a new class of GLP-1 drugs that aims at three hormone receptors

Close-up of a blue medical injector on a conveyor line during the production process at a modern pharmaceutical factory.

Getty Images/sweetbunfactory

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The next generation of glucagonlike peptide 1 (GLP-1) weight-loss drugs has taken another step forward to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. In new clinical trial results from the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly, a weekly injection of 12 milligrams (0.19 grain) of retatrutide for 80 weeks helped people lose almost 30 percent of their body weight—about 70 pounds on average—according to a statement from the company.

That puts retatrutide essentially on a par with bariatric surgery, says Daniel Drucker, a university professor of medicine at the University of Toronto, who has previously consulted for Eli Lilly but was not involved in the trial. “This has always been the GLP-1 medicine that we have viewed as the most potent, [with] the greatest weight loss,” he says.

Unlike other approved GLP-1 medications, Wegovy and Zepbound, which also target the gut hormone GLP-1, retatrutide targets three receptors known to regulate appetite—GLP-1, glucagon and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Targeting more than one receptor seems to boost the medications’ weight-loss effects. For example, tirzepatide (sold under the brand name Zepbound) targets two receptors, and clinical trials suggest it helps people lose more weight than semaglutide (the active ingredient in Wegovy), which only targets one.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new retatrutide study is a phase 3 clinical trial—the gold standard needed to secure eventual FDA approval—called TRIUMPH-1. The participants were all classified as either overweight or having obesity, with an average baseline weight of 248.5 pounds. At the highest doses of retatrutide tested—12 milligrams (0.19 grain)—participants lost 28.3 percent of their weight on average.

“TRIUMPH-1 highlights the importance of options and the potential for retatrutide to help people across various stages of their obesity journey,” said Kenneth Custer, an executive vice president of Eli Lilly and president of Lilly Cardiometabolic Health, in a statement.

The results also highlighted potential side effects: about a third of participants reported nausea or diarrhea, while about a quarter reported constipation. Between 10 percent and a quarter experienced vomiting, depending on the dose. These effects were in line with expectations, Drucker says.

“If it’s approved..., this would be the drug that people who need to lose the most amount of weight would gravitate to,” he adds.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe