Nice Germs Finish Last: "Good Samaritan" Bacteria Provide New Clues in Antibiotic Resistance

Resistant bacteria help their kin survive antibiotics, but at a cost

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The world is full of Good Samaritans; you’ll find many of them in your own body. James J. Collins, a biologist at Boston University, has found that small numbers of drug-resistant bacteria help their vulnerable counterparts survive antibiotic onslaughts, even at a cost to themselves.

Collins and his colleagues exposed one culture of Escherichia coli—some strains of which colonize the human and animal gut; others of which are notorious for causing disease outbreaks—to increasing amounts of an antibiotic over time. When they periodically analyzed the levels of drug resistance in the colony, they saw something un­expected: although the entire popu­lation was thriving in the presence of the drug, only a few individual bacteria were actually resistant. “We were really surprised to see that the levels of resistance of the individual isolates were considerably lower than the population as a whole,” explains Collins, who published his results recently in Nature. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.) Further analysis revealed that the resistant mutants were secreting a molecule called indole that thwarts their own growth but helps the rest of the population survive by activating drug-export pumps on the bacterial cell membranes.

The findings could spur scientists to develop better antibiotics. If indole allows pathogenic bacteria to withstand antibiotics, it may be possible to thwart drug resistance by blocking indole signaling with small molecules, Collins says. Alternatively, “the findings suggest the possibility that scientists could one day use indole or an indole-based therapeutic, if proven safe, to help beneficial bacteria outcompete pathogenic bacteria in the urinary tract or intestinal system,” says Mark Anderson, chief scientific officer of Emeryville, Calif.–based Nova­Bay Pharmaceuticals, which develops drugs for antibiotic-resistant infections.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The results may also change the way doctors track infections in their patients. If a bacterial population can become antibiotic-resistant even when only a small number of individuals have the appropriate genetic mutations, doctors who collect and analyze small bacterial specimens from patients may underestimate just how resistant the infection is as a whole, Collins notes. “These unicellular organisms can function as a multicellular organism of sorts,” he says. Thus, isolated samples may not be representative of the big picture.

Melinda Wenner Moyer, a contributing editor at Scientific American, is author of Hello, Cruel World! Science-Based Strategies for Raising Terrific Kids in Terrifying Times (G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 2025).

More by Melinda Wenner Moyer
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Nice Germs Finish Last: 'Good Samaritan' Bacteria Provide New Clues in Antibiotic Resistance” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112010-7hDqwX99Ky0at0vybDhlRa

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe