Night Sight: Rapid Eye Movements Seem to Scan the Actions in Our Dreams

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Our eyes swivel restlessly in their sockets during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep—a phenomenon that has escaped explanation for decades. Research has suggested several possibilities: the eyes roll around to lubricate the inside of the eyelids; eyes jiggle to warm the brain; eyes twitch in response to stimulation from the brain stem. According to a study in the June issue of Brain, the most likely explanation is that our eyes orient their gaze to scan the imagery of our dreams—just as eyes change their gaze in response to our environment when we are awake and moving around.

In the study, neuroscientists at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris turned to a unique group of subjects: those with REM sleep behavior disorder. Such individuals do not enter the standard state of temporary paralysis that prevents any flailing about during dreams. Instead they physically act out their dreams: they kick, scream, grab, reach, climb and jump, enabling researchers to observe what normally remains inside a dreamer’s head. “It’s a direct window on people’s dreams,” says Isabelle Arnulf, a neurologist who specializes in sleep and a co-author of the study. “It’s kind of like having movie subtitles.”

Arnulf and her colleagues used electrodes to track the eye movements of 56 sleep disorder subjects and 17 normal sleepers, simultaneously videotaping their nocturnal behaviors. The researchers analyzed the nighttime footage of the patients frame by frame to see if their actions and gazes matched up.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And evidently they do. For 90 percent of the time, the gaze of a person with REM sleep disorder synchronized with mimed dream actions. A subject who dreamed of kissing someone to her left also looked to her left. Another participant who dreamed of climbing a ladder shifted his gaze up and down repeatedly to check his progress. Still another glanced over his shoulder as he ran from imaginary lions. If rapid eye movements were truly random twitches, then they would not match their accompanying dream actions so frequently, the researchers conclude. Apparently, when it comes to the neuroscience of dreaming, it’s best to believe your eyes.

Ferris Jabr is a contributing writer for Scientific American. He has also written for the New York Times Magazine, the New Yorker and Outside.

More by Ferris Jabr
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Night Sight: Rapid Eye Movements Seem to Scan the Actions in Our Dreams” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082010-2XluWyP9y5PXbruvJRnmGU

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe