New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NIH Plans to Spend Up to $20 Million on Search for Alternatives to Fetal Tissue for Research

The preliminary announcement comes in the wake of a Trump administration order that agency scientists to stop buying such tissue from humans

National Institute of Health Director Francis Collins.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The National Institutes of Health wants to fund up to $20 million worth of research into alternatives to using human fetal tissue to study disease, the agency announced Monday.

The announcement is largely preliminary. The formal funding opportunity announcements will be published at some date in the future, the agency said, and scientists cannot yet submit proposals to be funded. The total amount of money available has not been determined, according to the announcement, but the agency is “interested” in investing $20 million over the course of two years.

The notice comes in the wake of news reports that in September the Trump administration ordered NIH scientists, including one team researching a treatment for HIV, to stop buying new human fetal tissue. Scientists on that team were using the fetal tissue to create mice with a human-like immune system so they could study the disease.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For months, the Trump administration has been scrutinizing the use of human fetal tissue, which comes from abortions, in federally funded research. Already this fall, the Department of Health and Human Services launched an audit to determine how human fetal tissue was used in government research, the Food and Drug Administration canceled a contract with a fetal tissue provider, and NIH researchers were told to put a hold on new orders. In November, HHS said it would hold a series of meetings on the issue.

So far, the policy changes only apply to scientists on a government payroll. NIH spokesperson Amanda Fine told STAT Monday that there are no changes to the rules about fetal tissue research for scientists who have received NIH grants but are not employed by the government.

When describing the new funding, the NIH noted the value that research using human fetal tissue has brought to science and health, and said that alternatives would be more reliable.

“Research using these tissues has been important in shedding light on scientific questions fundamental to biomedical research, ranging from understanding basic physiologic mechanisms to understanding normal human tissue developmental and disease processes,” the announcement read. “However, new technologies raise the potential of reconstituting these model systems without fetal tissue yielding more replicable and reproducible system for broader uses.”

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on December 10, 2018

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe