No Charges after Ship Strike Killed Humpback Whale off Alaska

A ship strike killed a protected 30-foot (9-meter), 25-ton (22.6-tonne) female humpback whale off Kodiak on July 26, but an investigation could not conclude whether a state ferry was responsible

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Steve Quinn

JUNEAU Alaska (Reuters) - A ship strike killed a protected humpback whale off Kodiak, Alaska, but an investigation could not conclude whether a state ferry was responsible and no charges will be filed, federal officials said on Wednesday.

The state ferry Kennicott hit the 30-foot (9-meter), 25-ton (22.6-tonne) female whale as it was coming into harbor on July 26, and the probe had sought to determine if the giant mammal was already dead at that point.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The whales are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and under the Endangered Species Act.

Doug Meecum, deputy regional administrator with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said there was no evidence of any violation of laws, regulations or procedures.

"Investigators completed their due diligence," Meecum said.

The state ferry was traveling to Kodiak Island from Homer when the collision forced the whale's body partially onto the ship. As the ferry slowed, the whale then fell back into the water and only resurfaced two days later.

Kate Wynne, a marine mammal specialist for the University of Alaska Sea Grant Program, led the necropsy in late July.

Wynne said there was no doubt the whale died from being struck by a ship, but that there could be no way to know for sure whether it was alive when it was hit by the ferry.

She said a ship essentially "T-boned" the whale at the base of its skull, producing a fractured skull, vertebrae and ribs.

 

(Reporting by Steve Quinn; Editing by Daniel Wallis and Sandra Maler)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe