No Increased Stress from Heavier Social Media Use

Heavy users of the Internet and social media do not have higher levels of stress, and women who use Twitter, email and photo sharing show less stress than women who do not use them, a survey shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Reuters Staff

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Heavy users of the Internet and social media do not have higher levels of stress, and women who use Twitter, email and photo sharing show less stress than women who do not use them, a survey released on Thursday showed.

But the survey of 1,801 Americans by the Pew Research Center showed that such social media as Facebook can add to users' stress since they hear more about other people's tough times, such as job losses and deaths.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The data suggest that some analysts' fears are overblown that social media, cell phones and the Internet would take over users' lives and put them under more duress.

"There is no evidence in our data that social media users feel more stress than people who use digital technologies less or not at all," Keith Hampton, a Rutgers University professor who led the report, said in a statement.

People who are frequent users of the Internet and social media do not have higher stress levels than people who are not, and women have more stress than men, the survey showed.

Women reported an average score of 10.5 on the 30-point Perceived Stress Scale, the most common measure for stress. Men's average score was 9.8, the survey said.

There is no statistical difference in stress between men who use social media, cell phones or the Internet and men who do not.

But among women, stress levels are 21% lower for those who use Twitter several times a day, send or receive 25 emails a day, and share two digital photos daily, the survey showed.

The electronic tools "may provide women with a low-demand and easily accessible coping mechanism that is not experienced or taken advantage of by men," it said.

As for added stress, a woman with an average number of Facebook friends is aware of 13% more stressful events among her closest ties, such as divorce or a family death.

A typical male Facebook user knows of 8% more stressful events. Awareness of stress in others' lives can be a significant contributor to people's own stress, the survey said.

The report was based on a survey carried out from Aug. 7 to Sept. 16 and the margin of error for the full sample was 2.6 percentage points. The margin for the 1,076 people surveyed who used social networking sites was 3.3 percentage points.

SOURCE: http://pewrsr.ch/1AfIrea

Social Media and the Cost of Caring, January 15, 2015.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe