New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Data Points, January 2008

No Mercy from MRSA

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

New estimates of infections by an antibiotic-resistant bacterium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), have astounded experts, who had not considered it a major public health threat. Researchers conducted population-based surveillance at nine sites and extrapolated the 2005 data for the entire U.S. Recent fatal cases of invasive MRSA in children have also raised some concerns, although most deaths happened to people older than 65, and infections tended to occur at hospitals, rather than at schools and playgrounds.

Number of MRSA cases in 2005: 8,987

Number of in-hospital deaths: 1,598


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Estimated number of deaths: 18,650

Number of AIDS deaths in 2005: 17,011

MRSA infections per 100,000 people: 31.8

In those 65 years and older: 127.7

In those between five and 17 years: 1.4

SOURCES: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 17, 2007; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “No Mercy from MRSA” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 31
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-31d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe