Data Points, January 2008

No Mercy from MRSA

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

New estimates of infections by an antibiotic-resistant bacterium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), have astounded experts, who had not considered it a major public health threat. Researchers conducted population-based surveillance at nine sites and extrapolated the 2005 data for the entire U.S. Recent fatal cases of invasive MRSA in children have also raised some concerns, although most deaths happened to people older than 65, and infections tended to occur at hospitals, rather than at schools and playgrounds.

Number of MRSA cases in 2005: 8,987

Number of in-hospital deaths: 1,598


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Estimated number of deaths: 18,650

Number of AIDS deaths in 2005: 17,011

MRSA infections per 100,000 people: 31.8

In those 65 years and older: 127.7

In those between five and 17 years: 1.4

SOURCES: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 17, 2007; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “No Mercy from MRSA” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 31
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-31d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe