No-Pressure Diamond Scratchers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As the hardest substance known, diamond is ideal for cutting rock and other tough stuff. But diamond is costly, and it degrades when machining steel and other ferrous metals because of reactions that create softer iron carbides. For cutting steel, the first choice is cubic boron nitride, which is almost as hard, resisting 40 to 50 gigapascals (GPa) of pressure compared with diamond’s 70 to 100 GPa. But manufacturing the substance requires high temperatures (1,500 degrees Celsius) and extreme pressures (5 GPa), which make it expensive.

A low-pressure method may provide a less expensive route to ultrahard materials. “We wanted to design new hard materials, rather than finding them using trial-and-error methods,” says physical chemist Sarah Tolbert of the University of California, Los Angeles. The hardness of diamond and boron nitride arises because of short, covalent bonds that keep the constituent atoms strongly stuck together and rigid in all directions. certain “ultraincompressible” metals are rigid in two dimensions: they resist squeezing—the electrons inside them strongly repel one another—but they are relatively soft because their atoms are arranged in layers that can slide past one another. Tolbert and her colleagues found a way to harden these metals by introducing another element that covalently bonds to these layers, preventing them from slipping without disrupting incompressibility.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe