New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The 2013 Nobel Prizes: Who Won What?

A rundown of this year’s science Nobel laureates, along with links to Scientific American articles authored by the winners

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Physiology or Medicine: James E. Rothman, Randy W. Schekman and Thomas C. Südhof
News article: Researchers Win Nobel for Cell Transport System

Podcast: The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: Rothman, Schekman and Südhof

Read a 1996 article co-authored by James E. Rothman in Scientific American


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Physics: François Englert and Peter W. Higgs
News article: Higgs Boson Predictors Awarded the 2013 Nobel Physics Prize

Podcast: The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics: Englert and Higgs

In-Depth Report: The Higgs Boson at Last?

Chemistry: Martin Karplus, Michael Levitt and Arieh Warshel
News article: 2013 Chemistry Nobel Goes to Computer Modeling of Chemical Reactions

Podcast: The 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry: Karplus, Levitt and Warshel

Read a 1998 article co-authored by Michael Levitt in Scientific American

Scientific American Magazine Vol 309 Issue 5This article was published with the title “The 2013 Nobel Prizes: Who Won What?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 309 No. 5 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican112013-2mxGDGOtddQtTEX8pw7jwO

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe