Nobel in Physiology or Medicine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Image: The Nobel Foundation

It's Nobel week again, and the first prizes are out: Arvid Carlsson, Paul Greengard and Eric Kandel received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine this year for their discoveries in the field of "signal transduction in the nervous system," the Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute announced yesterday.

Greengard, who works at the Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Science at the Rockefeller University in New York City, discovered how dopamine and other transmitters exert their influence on the nervous system. Kandel, whose lab is located at the Center for Neurobiology and Behavior at Columbia University in New York City, investigated the molecular basis of learning and memory using the sea slug as an experimental model. Carlsson, of the department of pharmacology at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, discovered that dopamine is a transmitter in the brain and that a lack of it causes Parkinson's disease. Together their findings have led to the development of a number of new drugs to treat neurological and psychiatric disorders. More information about the new laureates' research is available from the Nobel Foundation at www.nobel.se/announcement/2000/medicine.html.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American