50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Nobel Viruses, Noble Gases and King of Fertilizers

Articles from the Scientific American archive

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

APRIL 1955
VIRUS REPLICATION--"A new view of the nature of viruses is emerging. They used to be thought of solely as foreign intruders--strangers to the cells they invade and parasitize. But recent findings, including the discovery of host-induced modifications of viruses, emphasize more and more the similarity of viruses to hereditary units such as genes. Indeed, some viruses are being considered as bits of heredity in search of a chromosome. --Salvador E. Luria" [Editors' note: Luria shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1969 for his work on the replication and interaction of viruses.]

POLIO VACCINE--"We shall soon learn the results of last year's extensive field test of the vaccine against poliomyelitis. Whatever the analysis of that test shows, the type of vaccine that is being tested will continue to be an issue among virologists, because an immunological principle is under test as well as a vaccine. The vaccine in question is made of a 'killed' virus, that is, a virus rendered noninfectious by treatment with formaldehyde. Many virologists believe such a vaccine can never be as effective as one containing live virus. I share the view that a killed-virus vaccine not only avoids the hazards of live virus but, if properly prepared and used, may be just as effective in producing immunity. --Jonas E. Salk"

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American