Nobel Worm Aids Understanding of Aging Processes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The worm behind this year's Nobel prize in medicine may also help scientists better understand the aging process, according to a new report. Three scientists who study Caenorhabditis elegans won this year's award for their investigations of the genetic processes that control organ development and cell death. Now findings published today in the journal Nature suggest that, in much the same way that humans do, the lowly worm experiences sagging muscles and a growing middle as it ages.

Monica Driscoll of Rutgers University and her colleagues studied the effects of aging on the C. elegans's cells and tissues. They discovered a condition known as sarcopenia, which is characterized by a progressive loss of strength and muscle mass. In particular, the researchers found that one enzyme, known as age-1/PI3 kinase, needs to be present in order for this muscle deterioration to occur. Because sarcopenia is also observed in people, the results could lead to a better understanding of the human aging process. "Once you have figured out what a key molecule is doing in the worm," Driscoll says, "you can look for it in humans and expect the same things to happen."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American