New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

North Korea Suspends Nuclear Testing

The U.S. offers food aid in exchange for moratorium on uranium enrichment and weapons testing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. Department of State today announced a breakthrough in negotiations with North Korea over the country’s controversial nuclear program.

Under the terms of the deal, North Korea will suspend nuclear testing, uranium enrichment and long-range ballistic-missile development in exchange for 240,000 tonnes of food aid from the U.S. The agreement would also allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors to enter the Yongbyon nuclear complex for the first time since 2009.

Of particular interest to the IAEA will be North Korea's uranium-enrichment program at Yongbyon. Sig Hecker, a metallurgist at Stanford University in California, saw 2,000 centrifuges during an informal visit he made to the site in 2010, but international inspectors have never officially had access to the facility.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This isn't the first time that North Korea has used its nuclear program as a bargaining chip. In exchange for disabling its 5-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon in 2008, North Korea was removed from the U.S.’s famous “axis of evil” list (which included Iraq and Iran) and supplied with fuel aid.

The agreement is the first major international political deal made by the nation's new leader, Kim Jong-un, who came to power in December 2011 following the death of the previous incumbent, Kim Jong-il. But that doesn't necessarily mean that the new leader is seriously considering cooperation with the West, warns Duyeon Kim, deputy director of nuclear non-proliferation at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington, D.C. Kim says that negotiations had been ongoing since before Kim Jong-il's death.

Both North Korea and the U.S. seem hopeful, yet wary. The State Department warned of “profound concerns” regarding North Korea's behavior generally, and the Korean Central News Agency warned that the moratorium would extend only “while productive dialogues continue.”

Duyeon Kim notes that there is no timeline for either the moratorium or the resumption of inspections. "We will have to see whether North Korea follows through," she says.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on February 29, 2012.

 

 

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe