Not All Bitters Taste the Same

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When it comes to food, the world abounds with people who pride themselves on having discriminating taste. Scientific assessments of our gustatory sensibilities, however, have proved less certain of that notion. A study conducted last year, for example, led researchers to conclude that, as far as our taste cells are concerned, all bitter flavors are the same. Now new findings, reported Friday in the journal Science, are calling that theory into question. Our taste buds, the researchers argue, are actually spectacularly sensitive to different bitter compounds.

When a taste receptor detects a bitter stimulus, it induces an increase in calcium concentrations in the cell. This prompts the cell to release a neurotransmitter. So in order to study the effects of different bitter compounds on taste cells, biologists Alejandro Caicedo and Stephen Roper of the University of Miami injected a fluorescent marker of calcium activity into taste cells procured from a rat's tongue. They then exposed the cells to five common bitter compounds, one by one, monitoring the cells' fluorescence levels.

The results were striking. Some 65 percent of the bitter-sensitive cells responded to only a single compound; 26 percent responded to two compounds; and 7 percent responded to more than two compounds. "It appears that different taste cells are tuned to different bitter compounds," Roper told Science. "These cells are not generalists, as some suggest." Although distinctions appear to be made at the cellular level, the authors note that whether or not bitter compounds can be discriminated behaviorally remains to be determined.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe