Not So Super
Will antibody therapies receive added scrutiny?
By Charles Q. Choi
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The drug's inventors called their creation a "superantibody." They hoped that it would be capable of activating immune cells other antibody drugs could not on their own. The moniker for the compound, targeted at autoimmune disease or leukemia, was TGN1412, made by TeGenero, based in W¿rzburg, Germany. On March 13 six previously healthy volunteers given the antibody in a routine test of its safety were sent to intensive care.
Although all the men are out of critical condition, one patient who went into a three-week coma after taking the drug may lose bits of his fingers and toes. Several medical experts assert that these results, which came after experiments with TGN1412 on rabbits and monkeys at up to 500 times the human dose, highlight the need for caution in designing trials of biotechnology drugs that work through novel mechanisms.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber