It's Not What Chimps Say, It's What They Gesture

A new study of chimpanzees and bonobos reveals that the meaning of vocalizations is fixed whereas the meaning of gestures depends on the context

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Man's closest relatives cannot be taught to speak, but chimpanzees (and other apes) can be taught to sign. Like their ape relatives, human babies find it difficult to say what they want, but they can sign for it. And although capuchin monkeys will beg for food with a gesture, no animal other than apes has been shown to regularly rely on gesticulation for communication. Now new research from the Emory University's Yerkes National Primate Research Center reveals the hidden complexity of ape gestures and argues that it may provide the symbolic basis for human language.

Amy Pollick and Frans de Waal recorded the interactions of two groups of chimpanzees in Atlanta and two groups of bonobos in San Diego. After 670 hours of watching and filming these animals, more than 1,000 video sequences of social interactions were analyzed for behaviors before and after a sign as well as what the reaction was. For the research, a gesture was defined as moving a limb or appendage in a way that is directed at another individual.

The researchers captured everything from a begging gesture that would suffice in most human households in the world to an oddly comic raising of the arms (and exposing of the armpits) to signal sexual interest. More importantly, analysis revealed that the meaning of these gesticulations depended upon context. "Paw outstretched could be used in food begging or after a fight for reassurance," Pollick says. "This kind of flexibility is a stepping-stone, perhaps, to symbolic language."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Chimpanzees and bonobos split from the human line roughly six million years ago and from each other roughly 2.5 million years in the past, according to genetic analysis, suggesting that perhaps such begging gestures are millions of years old. "We do know by looking at human gesturing that it's deeply ingrained in human communication strategies," Pollick says. "It's not just augmenting speech, it actually helps us think better and solve problems."

Of course, gesture as the basis for language remains speculative, says Pollick, and it may prove that other animals, such as dolphins, employ a language of gestures humans simply have not been able to detect. But a hand, or paw, rested lightly on the shoulder is a signal for attention that humans, chimpanzees and, perhaps, our distant ancestors would recognize.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe